.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Brewer Burns

Friday, July 21, 2006

Hard Times in the Old West

I’ve been neglecting the blog. I know. Hard times, hard times. I can’t seem to get it together. As usual I am trapped by my own issues. I am paralyzed in my own head space. Well, I’m working on it. For today, I’d like to talk about something completely different.

Jim West. Who is Jim West? Jim West is the former mayor of Spokane. He was recalled last December amid allegations that he used his position as mayor to seduce young men (like barely legal teenagers,) used his city computer to visit porn sites on the internet, and sexually harassed at least one (fairly young) man whom he had appointed to the human rights commission. Now, you may have actually heard of Jim West and the fallout from these allegations because the techniques employed to "catch" him actually made the national news. That’s not what I want to talk about though.

You see, a close friend and I disagree on the issue of whether West should have been recalled. His view is that mayors of cities surrounded on four sides by wheat fields (Spokane!) have been doing exactly what West did basically ever since they invented the office of mayor. The only difference was that those mayors: 1. Did not get caught and 2. Seduced young women instead of young men. And I agree. I’m certain that West is not the only mayor to have seduced and attempted to seduce young people using his position of power in a kind of quid pro quo fashion, nor will he be the last (hey, for all I know the new mayor is feeling up some city hall intern right now.) I also agree that if West had received a hand job from a woman or even a barely legal teenage girl that probably no one would have cared enough to run several front page stories in the local paper exposing him, and even if they had, he would not have been recalled. A large part of what happened to West is based in the fundamentally conservative homophobia that is the norm in Spokane. All that being said however, I still think that he should have been recalled.

I believe that recalling West was the right thing to do because he sexually harassed at least one man working for the city. I believe that West should have been recalled because he did offer city hall internships to young men while, at the same time, pursuing a sexual relationship with them. I believe that West should have been recalled, because when questioned about his offer of internships to these young men he said that it was fine for him to offer those internships (implicitly in exchange for sex, or perhaps simply as a result of an anticipated sexual relationship with them) because, get this, internships are unpaid. That’s right. He really believed that the unpaid status of the internships offered made a whole world of difference. But it doesn’t. No one should have to exchange sexual favors to obtain career advancement (and that’s what internships are, opportunities for career advancement.) No one should have to compete with people who are willing to exchange sexual favors to obtain career advancement. And, even more importantly, once career advancement has been achieved, no one should have to put up with a sixty-something small town politician persistently trying to feel them up, get naked with them, or otherwise sexually molest them in order to keep that job.

On the topic of Inappropriate and Unwanted Touching: have you all seen the pictures of our very own Dear Leader "massaging" the German Chancellor? No? Well, go over and see them here. Notice the look of disgust on her face?

EDIT: The news broke yesterday that Jim West died over the weekend. He was 55 and died as a result of complications from cancer.


At 10:54 AM, Blogger Moni said...

I have to totally agree with you on the Jim West thing. I think he was unfortunately recalled because of our cities rampant homophobia, rather than the other reasons that you list.

I work for the city. If I used my city-owned computer to look at porn during work hours you better believe that I would be fired in a heartbeat. Why shouldn't the mayor? He is a city employee. He works FOR us.

Ugh! we need a new president. what an embarrassment!

At 5:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Many people believe that when the rumors about Mr. West's being a pedophile has spread too far and too wide, he tried to cover his activities with very young boys (note his interest in young Boy Scouts) by, at least publicly, changing his sexual preference to 18 year olds that look like thirteen year olds. The issue wasn't homophobia, it was is pedophilia. Those rumors were alive and well around Spokane and Olympia for many years. It's interesting that his physical and verbal violence (resulting in being found quilty in court of making a death-threat over the phone) hasn't been mentioned lately. I wonder why?

At 8:12 AM, Blogger brewerburns said...

Anonymous-- (I didn't know that I had allowed anonymous comments) I too really wonder about West's pedophilia. Was he a pedophile? There is at least some good evidence that he was. I also had forgotten about the phone threat he made until I saw it in the paper over the weekend (in the article chronicling his political career.) So, while I agree that there were other issues aside from homophobia that got West removed from office, I still think that homophobia was a large part of it. But let's face it, I voted for the recall and I voted for it because he: may very well have been a pedophile, definitely sexually harassed men that worked at the city, and tried to seduce barely legal teenagers. I think he was sexual predator at his core and that's why I voted for the recall.


Post a Comment

<< Home

Locations of visitors to this page

<< *.* >>